Back
Policymaker (social systems) article
Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions with older adults in receipt of home care: A systematic review
Findings
Recency, quality and context of the findings
-
Last year literature searched2016
-
Year Published2017
-
Quality Rating7/9 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
-
Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conductedAustralia (4); New Zealand (2); Norway (2); United Kingdom (2); Denmark (1); Netherlands (1); United Kingdom (1); United States (1)
-
Global/regional focusNot yet available
-
Country focus
-
Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focusNot applicable
Additional details about the research
-
Type of documentEvidence syntheses addressing other questions
-
Type of questionDescription
-
FocusSpecific
-
DomainPrograms and servicesCommunity and social servicesOther social servicesSustainable Development Goals3. Good health and well-being (partially covered)
-
Social system topic(s)Delivery arrangementsHow services are designed to meet citizens’ needsPackage of services/service pathways
-
ThemeOptimal aging
Publication details
-
CitationSims-Gould J, Tong CE, Wallis-Mayer L, Ashe MC. Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions with older adults in receipt of home care: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2017;18(8):653-663.
-
DOI101016/j.jamda.2016.12.070


