How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of qualitative evidence

Findings

Evidence Summary

Evidence Summary
Supporting technical documents that are social systems-relevant

Not usually available for this document type
Scientific Abstract

PubMed
Scientific Abstract

Publisher

Recency, quality and context of the findings

Last year literature searched

Not yet available
Year Published

2018
Quality Rating

5/9 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conducted

France (9); Netherlands (6); UK (England) (5); Sweden (2); USA (2); Belgium (1); Canada (1); Finland (1); Japan (1); New Zealand (1); Singapore (1)
Global/regional focus

WHO - Americas region<br />WHO - European region<br />WHO - Western Pacific region<br />
Country focus

France (9); Netherlands (6); UK (England) (5); Sweden (2); USA (2); Belgium (1); Canada (1); Finland (1); Japan (1); New Zealand (1); Singapore (1)
Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focus

Additional details about the research

Type of document

Systematic review addressing other questions
Type of question

Not effectiveness
Focus

Specific
Target

Individual
Domain

Programs and services
Community and social services
Other social services
Sustainable Development Goals
3. Good health and well-being (partially covered)
Social system topic(s)

Delivery arrangements
With what supports are services provided
ICT that support individuals who receive services
Theme

Optimal aging

Publication details

Citation

Vandemeulebroucke T, de Casterlé BD, Gastmans C. How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging and Mental Health. 2018;22(2):149-167.
DOI

Not yet available

Register for free access to all Professional content

+AA