Back
Policymaker (health systems) article
Evaluating hospital tools and services that were co-produced with patients: A rapid review
Findings
Recency, quality and context of the findings
-
Last year literature searched2019
-
Year Published2020
-
Quality Rating7/10 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
-
Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conductedUnited Kingdom (4); Australia (2); Canada (2); Sweden (2); Netherlands (1); Spain (1); Viet Nam (1)
-
Global/regional focusNot yet available
-
Country focus
-
Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focusNot applicable
Additional details about the research
-
Type of documentEvidence syntheses of effects
-
Type of questionEffectiveness
-
FocusSpecific
-
Priority AreaNot applicable
-
Health system topic(s)Governance arrangementsConsumer & stakeholder involvementConsumer participation in service deliveryDelivery arrangementsHow care is designed to meet consumers' needsCase managementWith what supports is care providedICT/AI-enabled support for individuals who provide careICT/AI-enabled support for individuals who receive careImplementation strategiesConsumer-targeted strategyInformation or education provisionSystem participation
-
ThemeOptimal aging
-
DomainSectorsSpecialty careProvidersPhysiciansSpecialistsPhysiciansSpecialists
Publication details
-
CitationLim S, Morris H, Pizzirani B, Kajewski D, Lee WK, Skouteris H. Evaluating hospital tools and services that were co-produced with patients: A rapid review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2020.
-
DOI10.1093/intqhc/mzaa020


