McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Policymaker (health systems) article

Evaluating hospital tools and services that were co-produced with patients: A rapid review



Findings
  • Supporting technical documents that are health systems-relevant
    Not usually available for this document type
  • Scientific Abstract
  • Scientific Abstract
Recency, quality and context of the findings
  • Last year literature searched
    2019
  • Year Published
    2020
  • Quality Rating
    7/10 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
  • Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conducted
    United Kingdom (4); Australia (2); Canada (2); Sweden (2); Netherlands (1); Spain (1); Viet Nam (1)
  • Global/regional focus
    Not yet available
  • Country focus
  • Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focus
    Not applicable
Additional details about the research
  • Type of document
    Evidence syntheses of effects
  • Type of question
    Effectiveness
  • Focus
    Specific
  • Priority Area
    Not applicable
  • Health system topic(s)
    Governance arrangements
    Consumer & stakeholder involvement
    Consumer participation in service delivery
    Delivery arrangements
    How care is designed to meet consumers' needs
    Case management
    With what supports is care provided
    ICT/AI-enabled support for individuals who provide care
    ICT/AI-enabled support for individuals who receive care
    Implementation strategies
    Consumer-targeted strategy
    Information or education provision
    System participation
  • Theme
    Optimal aging
  • Domain
    Sectors
    Specialty care
    Providers
    Physicians
    Specialists
    Physicians
    Specialists
Publication details
  • Citation
    Lim S, Morris H, Pizzirani B, Kajewski D, Lee WK, Skouteris H. Evaluating hospital tools and services that were co-produced with patients: A rapid review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2020.
  • DOI
    10.1093/intqhc/mzaa020

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register