Back
Policymaker (health systems) article
What works in implementation of integrated care programs for older adults with complex needs? A realist review
Findings
Recency, quality and context of the findings
-
Last year literature searched2015
-
Year Published2017
-
Quality Rating7/9 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
-
Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conductedUnited States (26); United Kingdom (13); Canada (11); Australia (3); Italy (3); Netherlands (3); Sweden (3); New Zealand (2); France (1)
-
Global/regional focusNot yet available
-
Country focus
-
Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focusNot applicable
Additional details about the research
-
Type of documentEvidence syntheses addressing other questions
-
Type of questionEffectiveness
-
FocusSpecific
-
Priority AreaNot applicable
-
Health system topic(s)Delivery arrangementsHow care is designed to meet consumers' needsCase managementPackage of care/care pathways/disease managementBy whom care is providedSkill mix - Multidisciplinary teamsSkill mix - Communication & case discussion between distant health professionalsStaff - Continuity of careSelf-managementWhere care is providedSite and modality of service deliveryContinuity of careOutreachWith what supports is care providedICT/AI-enabled support for individuals who receive care
-
ThemeOptimal aging
-
DomainProvidersPhysiciansNursesAllied health professionals
Publication details
-
CitationKirst M, Im J, Burns T, Baker GR, Goldhar J, O'Campo P, et al. What works in implementation of integrated care programs for older adults with complex needs? A realist review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care (IJQHC). 2017;29(5):612-624.
-
DOI10.1093/intqhc/mzx095


