McMasterLogo_New-2017-300x165
Back
Policymaker (health systems) article

Alternative payment models and associations with stroke outcomes, spending, and service utilization: A systematic review



Findings
  • Supporting technical documents that are health systems-relevant
    Not usually available for this document type
  • Scientific Abstract
  • Scientific Abstract
Recency, quality and context of the findings
  • Last year literature searched
    2020
  • Year Published
    2022
  • Quality Rating
    6/10 (AMSTAR rating from McMaster Health Forum)
  • Countries in which studies (included in the synthesis) were conducted
    USA (28); Italy (2); Taiwan (2); UK (England) (2); China (1); Norway (1)
  • Global/regional focus
    Not yet available
  • Country focus
    USA (28); Italy (2); Taiwan (2); UK (England) (2); China (1); Norway (1)
  • Low - and middle-income country (LMIC) focus
s
Additional details about the research
  • Type of document
    Systematic review addressing other questions
  • Type of question
    Not effectiveness
  • Focus
    Specific
  • Target
    Not yet available
  • Priority Area
    Not applicable
  • Health system topic(s)
    Financial arrangements
    Funding organizations
    Capitation (Funding)
    Global budget
    Case-mix funding
    Targeted payments/penalties (Funding)
    Remunerating providers
    Capitation (Remuneration)
    Episode-based payment
    Targeted payments/penalties (Remuneration)
  • Theme
    Optimal aging
  • Domain
    Diseases
    Non-communicable diseases
    Cardiovascular disease
Publication details
  • Citation
    Brown K, El Husseini N, Grimley R, Ranta A, Kass-Hout T, Kaplan S, et al. Alternative payment models and associations with stroke outcomes, spending, and service utilization: A systematic review. Stroke. 2022;53(1):268-278.
  • DOI
    10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.033983

Register for free access to all Professional content

Register